1. Assessment — $500
We walk your floor (in person or remote). Score your Maintenance AI Readiness. Deliver a written gap report and a namespace blueprint. Takes 1 day.
The Maintenance Knowledge Layer
FactoryLM
Cited troubleshooting answers from your manuals, assets, and fault history.
Without rebuilding your CMMS.
Your manuals are in filing cabinets. Your fault history is in someone's head. Your PLC tags don't match your asset names — so generic AI guesses. We structure all of it into a Maintenance Intelligence Namespace — the AI-ready infrastructure MIRA runs on — then MIRA answers technicians with citations.
Most plants start with the $500 on-site assessment — you leave with a written gap report and a namespace blueprint. Already a customer? Sign in.
68,000+ chunks of OEM documentation indexed
- Allen-Bradley
- Siemens
- ABB
- Schneider Electric
- Yaskawa
- Mitsubishi
- Rockwell
- Honeywell
Three ways we work with you.
Start with the assessment. Most plants don't need everything at once.
2. Pilot — $2–5K/mo
We structure one line: nameplates scanned, manuals indexed, PLC tags mapped, PMs extracted, fault history captured. MIRA goes live on that scope. 3-month minimum.
3. Operating Layer — $499/mo
MIRA in production across the plant. Telegram + web + CMMS write-back. Quarterly namespace audits. Continuous structuring as new assets come online.
Why generic AI fails on the floor.
Same question. The difference is whether your maintenance world has been structured.
"Why is the Powerflex 755 tripping F005 at 1,200 RPM?"
Generic AI (no namespace)
F005 is typically caused by undervoltage at the input or a brownout condition. Check incoming line voltage and confirm your PLC tag mapping.
No plant context. No manual citation. No history. Hallucination risk.
MIRA (on a structured namespace)
F005 on this drive (Asset POW-755-A12) means DC bus undervoltage. Last 7 days show 4 trips at the same RPM band, all overnight. Manual §6.2 says to check the bus capacitor bank — your 2024-12-14 PM noted bulging on cap 3.
Manual §6.2 (PowerFlex 755)PM 2024-12-14Trips: last 7 d
How it works.
Structure first, answers second. The namespace is what makes the AI trustworthy.
Scan assets & nameplates
Every machine, sub-component, and motor — captured with its nameplate, in person or from a photo.
Bind manuals to assets
OEM manuals, wiring diagrams, and datasheets indexed and attached to the asset they serve.
Map fault history, CMMS & PLC tags
Work-order history and PLC tag names reconciled to the right asset — the IT/OT gap, closed.
Ask MIRA
A technician asks a fault-code or troubleshooting question in Slack, Telegram, or the web.
MIRA cites the source
Every answer points to the manual section, fault-history entry, or PLC tag that grounds it.
Draft PMs & work orders
Validated answers become PM suggestions and work-order drafts — synced to your CMMS.
What we structure during a pilot.
The Maintenance Intelligence Namespace — the foundation AI needs.
Structured asset hierarchy
Machine → sub-component → motor → relay. Every nameplate scanned, every manual bound to the asset it serves.
PLC tags reconciled to assets
LINE3_VFD1_CURRENT now knows it lives on Asset POW-755-A12. AI can finally cross the IT/OT gap.
Tribal knowledge captured
Senior tech's voice notes become structured RCA records. The 30-year fault history doesn't retire with them.
Built for the floor.
Every document gets a state. Every safety signal gets a stop.
Indexed
Partial · Tap to rescan
OCR failed · Tap to retry
Superseded
⚠ STOP — Voltage above safe range
MIRA detected 480 V on a 240 V branch via the photo you sent at 02:14. Do not energize. Verify with a meter before any next step.
Who it's for.
We'd rather tell you up front. See the full list on Limitations.
Built for
- Maintenance managers
- Plant managers
- Reliability engineers
- Controls engineers & integrators
Not the right fit (yet)
- Teams with no manual or document access to structure
- Buyers looking for a standalone CMMS replacement
- Anyone expecting autonomous safety decisions — MIRA escalates, it doesn't act